Is it acceptable that a physician adhered to an accepted school of thought?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from James v. White, 1999 CanLII 3133 (BC SC):

In circumstances where the evidence discloses differing schools of thought as to the appropriate standard of care, it is acceptable that the physician adhered to an accepted school of thought and whether one of the accepted schools of thought is the better is not a legal issue. [See Belknap v. Meakes, supra].

Other Questions


What is the test for making a decision in favour of one of the accepted school of thought over another? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for refusing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of mileage to and from school for school trips? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it sufficient to establish that an accepted injury was the most significant cause or accepted injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the School Authority and Surrey School District be held liable for discriminatory collective agreements? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it in the public interest for a school to accept an event that has been deemed unenforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party has been awarded double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of school, extended family connections and school connections on determining the best interests of the children? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.