Is there any error in law to import considerations of openness into the legal test for access to a child?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Children's Aid Society of Toronto v. K.S., 2015 ONCJ 635 (CanLII):

[72] Justice Horkins S.C.J. in Children’s Aid Society of Toronto v. A.G, supra, found that it was an error in law to import considerations of openness into the legal test for access, specifically into the first prong of the test relating to whether there is a relationship that is meaningful and beneficial to the child. In her decision she reaffirmed that the 2011 amendments have not altered the two step test or changed who bears the onus of proof.

Other Questions


If a father's materials set out that he would assist in the mother continuing to have access to the child if the child was returned to the father, would the father's material set out to support the mother's access? (Ontario, Canada)
Can access to access roads constitute a legal right? (Ontario, Canada)
If a child takes a gap year before starting secondary education, can that child remain a child of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for having a beneficiary be a child of full legal capacity? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a non-custodial parent of a child entitled to regular access to the child by one parent? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a step-mother be awarded specified access to the child by the biological mother and father of the child? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for having access to a child under the Child Support Act? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Respondent have a right to access and child support and, if not, should his access be supervised? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a convicted child luring offender plead guilty in Canada to all charges arising out of his activities of child sexual exploitation and child pornography to the victim's parents in Canada? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consideration of child protection factors in determining the child’s best interests? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.