The respondent does not dispute that there has been a material change such that it is appropriate for this court to consider the appropriate orders dealing with access and child support. In making a determination with respect to the issue of access, the court should look at the matter afresh, and conduct a fresh inquiry into the best interests of the child (see Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27, para. 17). Should the Respondent’s Access be Terminated and, if not, should his Access be Supervised?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.