The following excerpt is from Brandiferri v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance, et al., 2012 ONSC 2206 (CanLII):
In Bowen v. Guardian Insurance Company, [1992] B.C.J. No. 901 (S.C.), the plaintiff argued that the deficient repairs were undertaken by the insurer. The court found that the restoration firms were retained by the plaintiffs’ daughter as their agent. The adjuster appointed by the insurance company who was an independent contractor gave evidence that he did not retain contractors on behalf of the insurer or the insureds but only proposed names that were familiar to him which the insureds accepted. Melvin J. found that “As the contractual arrangement is between the plaintiffs and those contractors, in my view, the plaintiff(s) can have no claim against the defendant for the alleged inferior quality of workmanship.” Melvin J. went on to find that the insurance company remained responsible for certain incomplete limits of repair. He also added that the plaintiffs were obliged to actually replace the items in order to take advantage of the replacement costs endorsement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.