In Elliott, Cromwell J.A. noted that in an action on the insurance contract, not only can the insured recover for the loss, but breach of the duty of good faith can sound in punitive damages as recognized in Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., supra. Thus, while not all heads of damages may be available in an action on the insurance contract, the availability of a remedy in contract was a significant policy reason not to expand tort liability. As he put it, at para. 84, the contractual remedy "is a substantial, if not always complete, alternative remedy which strongly works against the expanded liability in negligence proposed by the appellants".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.