In Bell v. Bell,[1999] B.C.J. No. 1999, 1999 BCCA 497 the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred in using the average of the past three years to determine Guideline income, even though there was evidence that the paying spouse’s current income was significantly less nthan the average. At ¶12 McEachern C.J.B.C. said: The guidelines that apply in this case require a fair fixing of income for this purpose. I think that the amount that the husband actually earns is a far better indicator of what figure should be used for this purpose than is achieved by averaging, particularly in an economy where employment is sometimes scarce and where there can be wide fluctuations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.