In my opinion, the comments of Smily, J., in Bender v. Raper, [1954] O.W.N. 93, at p. 94 are appropriate herein. He stated: “... Frankly, I am more concerned with the difficulties of consolidating actions in which some of the issues have arisen subsequent to the date of the issue of the writs in earlier actions. I do not think that in that situation there should be consolidation. I do not recall, nor have I been told of this ever having been done. It seems to me that this would cause complications. As I have intimated, I think it preferable to have the three actions proceed separately and be put on the list for trial all at the same time. ...”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.