How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "sexually diverse" in the definition of sex discrimination?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Midland Railway of Canada v. Young, 1892 CanLII 29 (ON CA):
So that it is by no means necessary to hold that the clause in question was added under any misconception of the law upon the subject; which law, I think, was correctly expounded in the year 1876, in Cameron v. Wigle, 24 Gr. 8, a judgment which hitherto has stood unchallenged.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court interpreted section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines and interpreted the meaning of the word "intentionally" in relation to child support? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Attorney General's submission in the Superior Court of Justice have any grounds to argue that the meaning of the word "definite" in the definition of a word? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court sentence an offender who sexually assaulted a 15 year old girl who was sexually assaulted by friends of her parents who plied her victim with alcohol? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any interpretative problem with the meaning of the word "sexual immorality"? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the definition of a pension in B.C. legislation that includes the term pension and annuity? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the rule on cross-examination in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of uninsured motorist coverage legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the appropriate means exception in the Limitations Act? (Ontario, Canada)
