In Webb v. Webb the court considered that part of the definition of property in the B.C. legislation that included “a right of a spouse under an annuity or a pension, home ownership or retirement savings plan”. The court declined to adopt a restrictive definition of the word “pension” so as to limit it to the type of pension which was triggered by retirement due to age and concluded that the husband’s entitlement to a disability benefit was a right under a pension and was therefore a family asset subject to equal apportionment between the parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.