In Smith v. Lau, Levine J. (dissenting) rejected the father’s argument that the agreement was repudiated because he was denied the only benefit to him, which was access to the parties’ child. Levine J. found that the provision granting sole custody to the mother provided additional benefits to the father because it enabled him to move to England, leaving her with all the responsibilities as sole custodian.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.