How have courts interpreted the appropriate means exception in the Limitations Act?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Soleimani v. Rolland Levesque, 2019 ONSC 619 (CanLII):

No doubt the appropriate means exception in the Limitations Act involves a weighing of competing interests. I would adopt the observation of Mew, J. in J.C v. Farant:

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
If a limitation period is extended after the expiry of the limitation period, is it appropriate to amend the statute of limitation period? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court interpreted section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines and interpreted the meaning of the word "intentionally" in relation to child support? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of uninsured motorist coverage legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order a transfer of a cause into this court from another court? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a limitation or exclusion of liability clause in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of section 15(1) of the Charter on access to the courts for those with limited financial means? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a custody agreement where the mother was granted sole custody of the child by the court? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a marriage agreement where the husband misled the wife into believing the husband’s parents were not interested in marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.