It is the intention of the parties at the time the property was purchased that is generally most relevant. See Skender v. Skender 2005 BCSC 418 (Dorgan J.) at paras. 12 – 17; Lindquist v. Waring at para 52. Both monetary and non-monetary contributions of a claimant towards the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of the property in question must be assessed in deciding whether the claimant has established entitlement to a share of the equity in the property. See Lindquist v. Waring at para. 60.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.