Even specific plans to use the funds for a family purpose may not suffice to make an asset ordinarily used for a family purpose. In Crocker v. Crocker (1993), 44 A.C.W.S. (3d) 126 (B.C.S.C.), proceeds of sale from an inherited apartment received approximately six months before the parties separated were held not to be a family asset, even though the trial judge concluded that the intention of the parties was probably to use the proceeds of the sale of the apartment to buy a house for themselves. Sinclair-Prowse J. held that “an intended or probable future use does not convert an asset into a family asset” (at para. 20).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.