The Christmas incident in and of itself would not justify dismissal. Considering the pay and working conditions, a small respite at the end of the busiest season of the year could hardly be regarded as a serious breach of company policy. However, not only did the plaintiff misrepresent the facts as she knew them to the defendant following the incident but, I have concluded, she did so under oath at this trial as well. As in Richardson v. Davis Wire, supra, the plaintiff's dishonesty irreparably damaged the employer-employee relationship.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.