The person alleging a family debt has the burden of proving its existence, and that it arose during the relationship or to preserve family property. Amounts owed that solely represent a corporate obligation, or which are no longer legally enforceable, do not constitute family debt. The erosion of a company’s value by a single spouse is not fairly placed on the other spouse, and does not constitute family debt: Chatha v. Uppal, 2018 BCSC 6.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.