The chambers judge found that circumstances exist which would cause undue hardship if he made an order for child support. While not stating why undue hardship exists, he was “convinced that an order requiring the respondent to provide child support would result in both a financial and an undue hardship to the respondent.”[8] He appears to rely on the fact that the financial obligations associated with raising a ten person family outweighs the financial obligation of maintaining a three person family. In so finding, he relied on Feniak v. Gerhardt.[9]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.