In what circumstances will a plaintiff be found solely at fault in an overtook collision?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sivasubramaniam v. Franz, 2008 BCSC 1089 (CanLII):
In George v. Kembel, the plaintiff cyclist was found solely at fault when he overtook and collided with the right rear of the defendant’s vehicle as it executed a right turn.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be found liable for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff is found to be at fault for the Second Accident, what are the damages for that accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff be found at fault under s. 1.1(2) of the Criminal Code for assault and battery? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts found that a plaintiff deliberately delayed serving a writ? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's soft tissue injury from a collision with another vehicle aggravated by a subsequent collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and defendant in a collision where neither party saw each other before the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff claim a no fault no-fault benefit under s. 7.21(a) of the BC's Workmen's Compensation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a motorcyclist be held at fault for a collision with a pickup truck? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will security be required for a plaintiff who is not a resident of a non-resident plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
