The application judge relied on the decision of this court in O’Brien v. Hamel (1990), 73 O.R. (2d) 88 in simply applying an arithmetic formula. It is quite true that in that case, the court applied an arithmetic formula, saying, at p. 98, “The courts have consistently held that if the number of irregular votes exceeds the plurality of votes cast, the election cannot stand.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.