The appeal is from the awards for general damages and for lost earning capacity. The essence of the first two grounds of appeal is that the trial judge erred when he awarded pecuniary damages for loss of the “royal jelly” needed to be an entrepreneur without any evidence that attribute had any economic value to the appellant. The appellant considers the award for that loss was included in general damages, as it was in Roberts v. Kidd [1998] B.C.J. No. 1198 (B.C.C.A.) and overvalued in that award.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.