What is the test for challenging an award in a personal injury case where damages are awarded on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tisalona v. Easton, 2017 BCCA 272 (CanLII):

As already mentioned, a trial judge’s assessment of damages is entitled to considerable deference. The approach to be taken when an award is challenged on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low was discussed by Mr. Justice K. Smith in Marois v. Pelech, 2009 BCCA 286, 95 B.C.L.R. (4th) 243:

Other Questions


What is the test for challenging an award for damages awarded by a jury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What categories of damages can be awarded in a personal injury action where there has been a criminal conviction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of personal experiences on the assessment of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the most common types of aggravated damages awarded in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.