What is the legal test for disclosure in the extradition context?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from United States of America v Amadi, 2017 ONSC 3446 (CanLII):
The Court of Appeal for Ontario in United States v. Larosa[8] articulated a three-step approach to the air of reality test for disclosure in the extradition context: (1) the allegations must be capable of supporting the remedy sought; (2) there must be an air of reality to the allegations; and (3) it must be likely that the documents sought and the testimony sought would be relevant to the allegations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for full disclosure in the context of a motion or application? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for liability for misleading disclosure in the United States? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the translation error in the context of a disclosure motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the duty to provide financial disclosure in the context of the valuation of a property? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for adversarial context? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the definition of “material” in the context of the disclosure rule? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of non-disclosure in the context of family law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test of undue influence in the context of a Will? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of non-compliance of disclosure rules in the context of family law? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the materiality of the legal advice required to justify disclosure of privileged information? (Ontario, Canada)
