Martin, J.A., as he then was, stated thus: “I am therefore prepared to hold that the domicile was sufficiently established to enable the plaintiff to maintain the action apart altogether from the question of the contents of the affidavit which is referred to in the judgment of the learned Chief Justice, and I will only add as to the affidavit that the learned trial Judge under the circumstances of the case—the action being undefended— might have considered it as evidence. Kalenczuk v. Kalenczuk 1920 CanLII 167 (SK CA), [1920] 2 WWR 415, 13 Sask LR 262.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.