Should a defendant have known that carjacking was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the burglary and robbery he aided and abetted?

What is the test for establishing that 'known that the charged offense was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the act aided and abetted?' (California, United States of America)

Is there a difference between a defendant and a defendant who aids and abets in the commission of an act of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)

Is a defendant guilty of aiding and abetting a burglary even if someone else committed some or all of the criminal acts? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether a criminal act was a natural and probable consequence of another criminal act aided and abetted by a defendant? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant who was an aider and abettor be held liable for any reasonably foreseeable crime committed as a consequence by the perpetrator? (California, United States of America)

Can a jury infer that shooting was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of an attempted burglary? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for "probable and reasonable" or "reasonably foreseeable" in addressing the natural and probable consequences of climate change? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant avoid punishment for both burglary and robbery under section 654 of the California Criminal Code where the burglary was incident to the objective of stealing from the victim? (California, United States of America)

Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who intended to aid and abet (the target crime)? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a robbery? (California, United States of America)