What is the test for establishing that 'known that the charged offense was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the act aided and abetted?'
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sanchez, B262845 (Cal. App. 2016):
known that the charged offense was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the act aided and abetted.' [Citation.]" (People v. Medina (2009) 46 Cal.4th 913, 920.)
2. Sufficiency of the evidence standard of review
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Should a defendant have known that carjacking was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the burglary and robbery he aided and abetted? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
When a jury is given instructions on aiding and abetting and withdrawal of one who aids and abets a crime, what are the implications of this error? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant aids and abets an intended offense and becomes liable for an unintended offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the charged offense is a natural and probable consequence of the charged offence? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
Is a District Attorney's Office required to establish proceedings before magistrates for the arrest of persons charged with or reasonably suspected of public offenses? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is charged with a charge of membership of a criminal gang commit one or more of the "two or more" predicate offenses necessary to establish a pattern of criminal gang activity? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "probable and reasonable" or "reasonably foreseeable" in addressing the natural and probable consequences of climate change? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a jury found that a member of a criminal gang, who was convicted of assault and assault by reason of his epilepsy, acted under duress, or was induced or aided by others to aid and abet the crime? (California, United States of America)
