British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Peters v. MacLean, 2014 BCSC 990 (CanLII):
In Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43 [Boston], the majority held that there was no reason per se that spousal support cannot continue past the date of retirement of a pension-holding spouse. The payor may apply for a variation, but will be required to demonstrate that there has been a material change in circumstances. The reduction in income following retirement may be such a material change.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.