I agree with the tribunal member in Dietrich v. Dhaliwal that the reasoning in Janzen does apply to a tenancy relationship, but my reasoning is a little different. I am not confident that it is correct to say that the sexual harassment implicitly became a condition of the tenancy. Rather, I would prefer to focus on the criteria set out in s. 10(1)(b) of the Code, which requires discrimination regarding a term or condition of the tenancy based on an enumerated ground. In that regard, I will refer to the legislation that governs residential tenancies.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.