The inquiry into this factor, as with all the contextual factors, must be conducted from the perspective of the reasonable claimant, that is, a reasonable person, dispassionate and fully apprised of the circumstances, possessed of similar attributes to, and under similar circumstances as, the claimant. However, even if a legislative distinction serves a relevant ameliorative purpose, the reasonable claimant may still perceive that his or her dignity has been infringed. See Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2003 SCC 34, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 835, at para. 28.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.