While it is not necessary to decide the issue in this case, I think it is arguable that a successful party may not obtain a costs award in his or her favour even in circumstances not falling within sub-rule 24(4). There may be circumstances aside from the unreasonableness of the successful party’s conduct that rebut the presumption. See Ramsay v. Ramsay, at para. 10.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.