The father argues that these details were important as reflected in the terms of his offer to settle which eventually ended up in the final Minutes of Settlement. To determine success, however, the court must, as is often the case in determining costs after a trial, review the issue from the perspective of the major issues before the court rather than reviewing details surrounding the settlement of those issues. There is ample case law to suggest that where success is difficult to determine or allegedly divided, then the court should “award costs to the party who was more successful on an overall global basis” (Jackson v. Mayerle, 2016 ONSC 1556, para. 66 and 67, per Pazaratz J.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.