Comments about the reasonable suspicion standard and the use of sniffer dogs in R. v. Kang-Brown and R. v. A.M. are generally applicable to the use of sniffer dogs in traffic stops. Writing for the majority, Binnie J. held in R v. Kang‑Brown, at para. 25, that sniffer dog accuracy underlies the reasonable suspicion standard: The charter standard of “reasonable suspicion” is based, as stated on the minimal intrusiveness, narrowly targeted objective and high accuracy of “sniffs” by specifically trained dogs […]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.