Is a court not obliged to relax standards or standards to accommodate the parties' lack of experience or familiarity with the rules of evidence and trial procedures?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fehr v HCL Contracting Ltd., 2019 ABPC 168 (CanLII):

A Court is “not obliged to relax . . . standards to accommodate the parties' lack of experience or familiarity with the rules of evidence and trial procedures”: McCallum v. Edmonton Frame and Suspension (2000) Ltd., 2016 ABQB 271 at para. 107.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted Rule 9.13 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have a duty or obligation to review the evidence at trial to determine guilt or innocence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the basis for the principle that a person who is not a party to the same type of accommodation as a party is entitled to a similar accommodation? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes “non-expert opinion evidence” in identification evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court treated a request for additional evidence in the context of the trial? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a witness give evidence that is not in evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a solicitor be served as an agent under Rule 16 of the Scottish Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing a trial decision? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.