What is the basis for the principle that a person who is not a party to the same type of accommodation as a party is entitled to a similar accommodation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Associated Investors of Canada Ltd. (Re), 1996 CanLII 10541 (AB QB):

I take this latter statement which I have underlined to be the source of this principle. This case was followed in Canada by decisions which include MacDonald v. Hauer (1976), 1976 CanLII 959 (SK CA), 72 D.L.R. (3d) 110 (Sask. C.A.).

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a court award costs on an indemnity basis or solicitor-client basis rather than party-party basis? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a person who is unable to appreciate the risk associated with certain activities entitled to be treated differently than a person with the capacity to understand the risk? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a contract between a party and party entitled to enrichment and deprivation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an unmarried person to be entitled to the same status as a married person? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the principle of res judicata apply when one party has brought a new cause of action against the same party? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an individual to obtain from another person who has contributed to another person's income? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a personal representative entitled to exercise his discretion? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a wrongful act, neglect or default that would have entitled the injured party to maintain an action and recover damages? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.