I do not think there is anything in the separation agreement or in the respondent’s letter of November 15, 1947, which precludes her from deciding the residence of the child from time to time. There is no duty upon her to either take the child to him or keep the child available for access by the petitioner to suit his convenience. If the petitioner desires access to the child it must be on terms agreeable to the respondent and he must provide the means therefor. Vide Hunt v. Hunt (1884) 28 Ch D 606, at 612-13, 52 LT 302.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.