How have courts interpreted the inadmissible chain of reasoning of the Inad-missible Chain of reasoning?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Khan (M.A.), 1996 CanLII 18043 (MB CA):

Noor Mohammed v. R., [1949] A.C. 182, provides another example of the "inad- missible chain of reasoning", where the effect of evidence of another similar occur rence was to deepen suspicion, not to prove guilt. Although it was a trial of a single charge of murder, the factual circumstances are remarkably similar to those in the case under appeal.

Other Questions


What is the test for interpreting the Queen's interpretation of the Queen’s Speech to the Court of Appeal? (Manitoba, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the concept of "unreasonable search" under s. 8 of the Fourth Amendment? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted section 24 (1) and 24 (2) of the Charter regarding the provision of state-funded counsel? (Manitoba, Canada)
How should a court consider the promotion of diversity and multiculturalism when determining the reasonableness of an administrative action? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will the courts interpret legislation on public access to the records of recounts and scrutinies? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of an inchoate or incomplete agreement between a buyer and seller? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the Human Rights Appeal Court have concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of Appeal in a collective agreement dispute? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a heading in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of "the law of the law" in the context of Inland Revenue Com'rs? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a seizure is reasonable and reasonable? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.