How have courts interpreted section 11 of the Limitations Act?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from 10475 Newfoundland Limited v. Houston, 2012 NLCA 34 (CanLII):

In Marsh v. Imperial Oil, 2001 NFCA 32, 120 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 346 Wells C.J.N.L. discussed the policy underlying section 11 of the Limitations Act at paragraph 34:

Other Questions


Is there any reason why the Court has a reluctance to re-open a decision already rendered? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the purpose of sentencing under section 718 of the Criminal Code of Canada? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How does section 810 of the Criminal Code interact with objective and subjective elements? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there any difference between the construction and interpretation of mixed fact and law in determining the existence of an oral contract? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is it an established exception to use of privileged correspondence to prove confirmation in response to a limitations defence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is this appeal to the Court of Appeal moot? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
When does a judicial review involve a matter of contractual interpretation? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts found that a defendant has not used a vehicle as a weapon in a sexual assault case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for meeting a statutory time limit? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How has the court treated a dispute between a husband and wife over the ownership of a dog? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.