Moreover, this case raises a novel point with ramifications beyond the circumstances here. The decision not to hear a case on the basis that it is moot is discretionary and courts may choose to hear a case in order to resolve a legal point of import even where it will have no impact on the parties before the court (see e.g. Tremblay v. Daigle, 1989 CanLII 33 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 530, at par. 10).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.