What is the test for continuation of an action where there is no reason to change the existing situation?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from LeBlanc v. Khallaf, 2010 NSSC 219 (CanLII):
In Marshall v. Marshall the Court of Appeal summarized this test and stated in paragraph 26 “...If there is no reason to change the existing situation, that situation should continue until the trial...”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for continuation of a trial where there is no reason to change the existing situation? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the reasons of a trial judge’s reasons for a finding of fact? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a change in income constitute a change of circumstances? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
If the existing jurisprudence on correctness and reasonableness is unfruitful, what are the factors used to determine correctness and correctness? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to strike for failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the rule of strict construction continue to exist? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial deference in determining whether a statutory interpretation is reasonable or unreasonable under reasonableness review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the impact of a finding that a class action is not the preferable procedure for bringing an individual action? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a variation of an order where a party is seeking to change the existing order? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness of actions taken by counsel in personal injury cases? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
