I interpret this provision to mean that any change in a parent’s income whether upward or downward may be a change of circumstances. As a result J.D.G. v. J.A.B. is useful in analyzing the issue around income changes and whether they constitute a “change of circumstances” if they are temporary or contrived. In that case, although there were decreases in income, the factual evidence led to a conclusion those changes did not constitute the necessary “change in circumstances”. The justice in J.D.G. v. J.A.B. utilized the analysis provided in Brown v. Brown, 2010 NBCA 5 to confirm that relief should not be given when there has been a decrease in income unless that decrease was significant and long-lasting, real and not chosen.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.