In their briefs on law, both the plaintiff and the defendants refer to the decision in Jeux Maritime Inc v. Lotteries Commission of New Brunswick, [1994] N.B.J. No 304. Many of the factors set out in that case are echoed in the case law across Canada, in particular: • Are there valid and compassionate reasons that warrant separate trials? • Would any adverse party be harassed or inconvenienced by separate trials? • Would separate trials probably put an end to the action? • Are the issues to be tried separate or interwoven? • Would severance of issues would ensure real savings of resources, and not be likely to increase the time required to dispose of the issues? • Would severance simplify the matters? • Is the credibility of witnesses who could testify at the various trials in issue?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.