In Miron v. Trudel, 1995 CanLII 97 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 418, 124 D.L.R. (4th) 693, McLachlin J., speaking for the majority, determined that marital status was an analogous group under s. 15(1) of the Charter. Rothstein J., in Collins v. Canada (supra), summarized his conclusions (at para. 31) by this statement: There is ample legal authority to conclude that being separated is a form of marital status and that marital status constitutes an analogous ground. See also Walsh v. Bona, supra, at p. 203.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.