What is the test for ordering separate trials under rule 47.03?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Roussel v. Charest, 2004 NBQB 446 (CanLII):

At paragraph 3, Drapeau, J.A. stated that the trial judge had the power, in exercising his discretion, to make an order under rule 47.03, if he thought it was “just and convenient” to do so. This criteria was also used by Lord Denning in Coenen v. Payne and Another (C.A.), [1974] 1 W.L.R. 984, where he stated that courts should be ready to order separate trials wherever it is just and convenient (“juste et commode”) to do so.

Other Questions


Is a motion for an order to separate liability and damages separate from a motor vehicle accident trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is a confidentiality order sealing the five-figure sum ordered by the Court of Appeal protecting the Diocese from disclosure? (New Brunswick, Canada)
When a separated spouse is a custodial parent of a child, is the separated spouse considered to be a party to a claim of hardship? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for severance of separate trials? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How have the courts in the Republic of Ireland considered the criteria established in other superior court cases for establishing that spouses are living separate and apart under the same roof? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of the pleadings on the outcome of the trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a separation constitute a marital status under s. 15(1) of the Charter? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is the petitioner entitled to benefit from the increased income of the respondent post-separation? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the appropriate living standard for the children of a separated parent? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for varied consent orders in the context of the Divorce Act? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.