California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mendoza, 192 Cal.App.3d 667, 238 Cal.Rptr. 1 (Cal. App. 1987):
In People v. Young (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 594, 149 Cal.Rptr. 524 another division of this court had an opportunity to decide the question now confronting us. The court there noted the "debatable" benefit of instructions regarding a defendant's right to remain silent but nevertheless concluded there was no error in giving them, either sua sponte or at the prosecution's request, when the defendant makes no objection. (Id., at p. 609, 149 Cal.Rptr. 524.) The court reasoned that "[p]resumably, if the defendant perceives a danger in the instruction, he will object. If he declines to object any prejudice is speculative since it is possible that the instruction actually worked to the defendant's advantage." (Id.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.