California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bettencourt, C058010 (Cal. App. 6/5/2009), C058010 (Cal. App. 2009):
As defendant admits, she had the same basic defense to all of the thefts, that her employer authorized them. This was not a case of different defenses to different acts, each being used to prove the same count. (People v. Diedrich (1982) 31 Cal.3d 263, 283.) If there was error in not giving a unanimity instruction it was harmless under any standard.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.