Is the Secretary of State's findings of fact reviewable on review?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Adams v. Weinberger, 521 F.2d 656 (2nd Cir. 1975):
It is by now well settled that the Secretary's findings of fact may not be disturbed on review unless not supported by "substantial evidence," but that his legal conclusions based upon those facts are reviewable in their entirety. Herbst v. Finch, 473 F.2d 771 (2 Cir., 1972).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a state prisoner obtain federal habeas relief against a state court's finding that the state court was wrong? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Secretary of State's appeal against the District Court's order that a class of beneficiaries must exhaust all their administrative remedies before seeking judicial review of the order? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, how do we review the findings of the previous district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, how do we review the factual findings and legal conclusions de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
