However, as stated, I still consider the “interest” of the respondent in the land to be matrimonial property. It comes within the phrase “real . . . property whatsoever, regardless of its source, kind or nature, . . . in which an interest is held . . . “ This “interest” has a real value, however difficult to ascertain, and the applicant is entitled to be compensated for her share of that value. A similar position was adopted in Sandy v. Sandy, supra. Therefore, I am including the present residence of the respondent and the possessory rights of the respondent in the farm land as matrimonial property.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.