The following excerpt is from Earl v. Turnbull, D.C. No. 3:02-cv-00224-HRH, No. 08-35684 (9th Cir. 2010):
suppressed his confession to the murder because he was not read the list of rights provided in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966). He also argues police violated his due process rights by coercing him into an involuntary confession. Earl additionally alleges that he was prejudiced by courtroom security placement during trial, and that he exhausted in state court a claim that he was denied a fair trial on the basis of one witnesses' testimony.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.