California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Flint v. Sacramento County Employees' Retirement Assn., 164 Cal.App.3d 659, 210 Cal.Rptr. 439 (Cal. App. 1985):
10 The court reversed the judgment denying the employee the service-connected disability retirement, holding that under section 31720, as amended, the employee was entitled to such retirement because the "employment contributed substantially to his disability." (Lundak v. Board of Retirement, supra, 142 Cal.App.3d at p. 1046, 191 Cal.Rptr. 446.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.