The following excerpt is from Harrison v. Moore, Case No. 1:08-cv-1065-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. 2015):
"A state officer is not protected by qualified immunity where he or she has violated a clearly established constitutional right." Phillips v. Hust , 588 F.3d 652, 657 (9th Cir. 2009). "The relevant, dispositive inquiry in determining whether a right is clearly
Page 22
established is whether it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was not unlawful in the situation he confronted." Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 202 (2001).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.