In Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180, Murray J. considered whether tax-free annuity payments in settlement of a personal injury law suit should be included as income for child support purposes. At ¶ 24-45, she canvassed a number of authorities and summarized their principles as follows: (a) In cases where the evidence establishes a portion was paid on account of lost wages and a portion was paid for costs of future care, some courts have determined that only the portion for lost wages will be treated as Guidelines income; (b) In cases where there is no allocation, some courts by contrast have treated the entire amount as income; and (c) In some cases, courts chose to attribute the same income to the payor as that earned prior to the accident.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.