However, Justice Shelston had ordered the father to pay support based on an imputed income, rather than his actual income, because he concluded that the father had not made adequate efforts to find alternative employment. If a person wishes to argue that an imputed income is no longer appropriate, the person must go beyond establishing what their actual income is. The person must present evidence of changed circumstances that show either that it is no longer necessary or appropriate to impute income or that a different amount would be more appropriate. (Trang v. Trang, at para. 52.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.